Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Reuters Changing Their Propaganda Team On Global Warming

Funny thing, I just commented (in the previous article) on a Reuters article about global warming/climate change politics, and now I see this article about how Reuters has shaken up their "reporting" staff  on global warming.  Do you think maybe the FBI, NSA, EPA, and IRS have been spying on them and asking (coercing) them into a more conventional party line on the subject of global warming and climate change?
Peter

Posted: 16 Jul 2013 01:12 PM PDT
reutersWinds of change are blowing through Reuters’ environmental coverage. One of its three regional environment correspondents “is no longer with the company” and the other two have been ordered to switch focus, people inside the agency say.
 
A perceptible shift in Reuters’ approach to the global climate change story has attracted international attention. Scientists and climatologists as well as non-governmental and international environment bodies have detected a move from the agency’s straight coverage towards scepticism on the view held by a vast majority of scientists that climate change is the result of human pollution of the atmosphere and environment. They see generally fewer stories on the issue. Some say they have been taken aback by Reuters’ new direction and are concerned that this could contribute to a change in government and public perceptions of climate change.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow, marvelous blog structure! How lengthy have you ever been running
a blog for? you made running a blog glance easy. The total look of your
site is wonderful, as neatly as the content!


my web site: Hum Badal Gaye

Anonymous said...

Truly no matter if someone doesn't understand afterward its up to other people that they will help, so here it happens.

Have a look at my webpage :: Axl Hazarika Hum Badal Gaye

Anonymous said...

Here is where David Fogarty works:

http://fallingapplesconsultants.com/who/#!/what/

Sounds to me like he went into business for himself---very AGW oriented still.

Are you sure your source is correct?