Pete'sPlace On Global Warming/Climate Change
Exploring the issue of global warming and/or climate change, its science, politics and economics.
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Absolutely fantastic and reining in the destructive, oppressive, obstructive, overzealous, incompetent, job-killing, out-of-control EPA is LONG overdue, especially where it concerns their false narrative about the total hoax that is the idea of man-caused global warming. Want to make America great again? Start with eliminating and starting over with the EPA.
http://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2016/12/7/13873894/scott-pruitt-trump-epa
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
On the sad passing of Bob Carter, a great scientist and friend
From Joe BastFriends,It is with deep regret that I report the passing of a friend, colleague, and great scholar, Dr. Robert M. Carter. Bob died peacefully in a hospital surrounded by family and friends following a heart attack a few days ago. He was 74 years old.Funeral arrangements are being made and it will most likely take place on Monday next week in Townsville, Australia.This is almost unspeakably sad. Bob was the very embodiment of the “happy warrior” in the global warming debate. He was a scholar’s scholar, with impeccable credentials (including a Ph.D. from Cambridge), careful attention to detail, and a deep understanding of and commitment to the scientific method. He endured the slings and arrows of the anti-science Left with seeming ease and good humor and often warned against resorting to similar tactics to answer them.Bob never failed to answer the call to defend climate science, getting on planes to make the long flight from Australia to the U.S., to Paris, and to other lands without complaints or excuses. He was a wonderful public speaker and a charming traveling mate. He was not an easy man to edit, though – he kept wanting to put unnecessary commas, “that’s,” and boldfacing back into his manuscripts — but the great ones never are.Bob helped immeasurably with three volumes in the Climate Change Reconsidered series, a series of hefty compilations of scientific research he coauthored and coedited with Craig D. Idso and S. Fred Singer. Just a few weeks ago, he flew to Paris to speak at Heartland’s “Day of Examining the Data” and contributed to the completion and review of another book, Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC report on scientific consensus.We honored Bob with a “Lifetime Achievement Award” at the 10th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-10) in Washington DC last June. I regret that I missed that event due to the sudden onset of shingles, and so missed the opportunity to see my friend as well as publicly recognize his great achievements in science.We’ve updated Bob’s online bio, it is copied and pasted below. A “guestbook” is being created at Heartland’s blog, Somewhat Reasonable. If you have a comment or memory you’d like to share, please send it to Jim Lakely at jlakely@heartland.orgPlease remember Bob and his wonderful wife, Anne, in your thoughts and prayers.Joe———————
Robert M. Carter, Ph.D., a long-time policy advisor to The Heartland Institute and a world renowned authority on climate change, passed away on January 19, 2016. He was 74.Dr. Carter was a palaeontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist and environmental scientist with more than 30 years professional experience. He earned degrees from the University of Otago (New Zealand) and the University of Cambridge (England). He held tenured academic staff positions at the University of Otago (Dunedin) and James Cook University (Townsville), where he was Professor and Head of School of Earth Sciences between 1981 and 1999.Dr. Carter served as Chair of the Earth Sciences Discipline Panel of the Australian Research Council, Chair of the national Marine Science and Technologies Committee, Director of the Australian Office of the Ocean Drilling Program, and Co-Chief Scientist on ODP Leg 181(Southwest Pacific Gateways).Dr. Carter was one of the world’s leading authorities on the science of climate change. He was the author of two books on the subject, Climate: The Counter Consensus (2010) and Taxing Air: Facts and Fallacies about Climate Change (2013) and coauthor of several more, including three volumes in the Climate Change Reconsideredseries produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) and published by The Heartland Institute. Shortly before his death he coauthored Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming (2015).Dr. Carter’s public commentaries drew on his knowledge of the scientific literature and a personal publication list of more than 100 papers in international science journals. His research on climate change, sea-level change and stratigraphy was based on field studies of Cenozoic sediments (last 65 million years) from the Southwest Pacific region, especially the Great Barrier Reef and New Zealand.Dr. Carter has acted as an expert witness on climate change before the U.S. Senate Committee of Environment & Public Works, the Australian and N.Z. parliamentary Select Committees into emissions trading and in a meeting in parliament house, Stockholm. He was also a primary science witness in the Hayes Windfarm Environment Court case in New Zealand, and in the U.K. High Court case of Dimmock v. H.M.’s Secretary of State for Education, the 2007 judgment which identified nine major scientific errors in Mr. Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth.”Dr. Carter’s research was supported by grants from competitive public research agencies, especially the Australian Research Council (ARC). He received no research funding from special interest organizations such as environmental groups, energy companies or government departments.On March 3, 2015, Dr. Carter authored a lengthy correction of the scurrilous attacks by the environmental left against his friend and honorable colleague Dr. Willie Soon. Read it here.In December 2015, Dr. Carter joined Heartland’s contingent to Paris for COP-21 and presented at the “Day of Examining the Data.” Watch his presentation, and comments about an anti-CO2 demonstration below.Joseph BastPresidentThe Heartland InstituteWeb site http://www.heartland.org
Share this:
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Have We Passed the Point of No Return on Climate Change?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/have-we-passed-the-point-of-no-return-on-climate-change/
Don't despair. We are reaching the point where we realize and admit that yes, the climate is changing, and we have little or no control over this happening. We had best move on to something far more important. Like maybe the world economy? Like maybe the prevention of war?
Peter
Greenhouse gas cuts must begin soon or it could be too late to halt global warming
April 13, 2015 |By EarthTalk
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/have-we-passed-the-point-of-no-return-on-climate-change/
Don't despair. We are reaching the point where we realize and admit that yes, the climate is changing, and we have little or no control over this happening. We had best move on to something far more important. Like maybe the world economy? Like maybe the prevention of war?
Peter
Friday, July 11, 2014
REAL SCIENCE ???
The Death of Science in our public schools.
Doesn't science involve inquiry, hypothesis, testing, and creative thinking? Since most of our public education is government-controlled, it has become politicized, and in my opinion, mortally wounded. So now we teach dogma and ideology, regardless of facts. Specifically, consider what passes for "climate science". Anyone not speaking the "party line" is derogatorily called a "denier", or worse. Our schools and our country are in deep trouble because we're raising generations of obedient little robots who never learn to think for themselves. Some liberal knows what is right and what is "best" for them, and that is all they are taught.
Consider how low we have sunk when we have liberals dictating what is taught in our public schools. This is an old story that seems to be getting worse. It makes one fear for the future of America. Think about this quote taken from he following article.
Peter
“I think having some sort of a mandate and a standard about whats taught is really crucial, because there’s a lot of variance in this state — I’m in a progressive area, but in the rest of the state, there are probably a lot... of climate deniers who are teachers,” she said. “I think they just need to know that you can have those views but you can’t teach them in school. You have to teach real science.”
Peter
“I think having some sort of a mandate and a standard about whats taught is really crucial, because there’s a lot of variance in this state — I’m in a progressive area, but in the rest of the state, there are probably a lot... of climate deniers who are teachers,” she said. “I think they just need to know that you can have those views but you can’t teach them in school. You have to teach real science.”
Monday, July 7, 2014
Friday, June 27, 2014
Who Are You Calling A "Denier"?
The Label "Denier" Is A Lie
I am not in "denial". I am not part of any "public relations" program. I am not beholden to nor paid by anyone to express my opinion about what I call the myth of man-caused global warming. Oh, and I am an Earth Scientist, a Geologist to be exact. My original interest in this subject has been purely scientific. It is politicians who have made global warming a world-wide political and economic issue. I have all of this well-documented and I've done it purely as a hobby, as ...almost a personal battle against injustice.
It is unjust because most people are not scientists and are too busy with their own lives to look into the real science behind the concept of man-caused global warming. As sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, I am sure man's activities are not significantly involved in causing global warming or climate change. People are and have been systematically, callously, relentlessly, calculatingly indoctrinated into believing that the burning of fossil fuels, (coal and oil) is causing global warming, climate change and every weather-related event, the more dramatic and destructive the better.
And our government just keeps pouring out the false propaganda, and since the government might as well own the mainstream media, theirs is the only side of the story most people hear. It is a travesty and a tragedy. It is being pursued by governments for only one reason: to control the energy industry and use it as a means of further controlling and taxing the people. It is like taxing the food we eat or the air we breathe. When and if people become aware of this, they will become, as I am, outraged.
Read the following typically slanted article and check out my blog linked in the comments section.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwynne/2014/06/26/the-public-relations-debate-about-global-warming-heats-up/
And our government just keeps pouring out the false propaganda, and since the government might as well own the mainstream media, theirs is the only side of the story most people hear. It is a travesty and a tragedy. It is being pursued by governments for only one reason: to control the energy industry and use it as a means of further controlling and taxing the people. It is like taxing the food we eat or the air we breathe. When and if people become aware of this, they will become, as I am, outraged.
Read the following typically slanted article and check out my blog linked in the comments section.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwynne/2014/06/26/the-public-relations-debate-about-global-warming-heats-up/
Opening quote from the linked article in Forbes:
"The denial of man-made global warming is one of the greatest PR campaigns in history. With echoes of the industry-funded research from tobacco companies that denied links between smoking and lung cancer, the well-coordinated PR plan has delayed new regulations for coal and petroleum industries and influenced millions of Americans."
The author of this article is wrong, exaggerated, uneducated, and inflammatory in nearly everything he says. It is little wonder I don't pay much attention to anything printed in Forbes Magazine. How can they pay someone to write something so stupid?
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Glaciers As Global Warming Drama, Part Of The Big Lie
The nonsense about man-caused global warming and climate change just keeps coming. It is the grandest hoax of our age, and that is saying a lot. What is the latest outrage to irk me? Glaciers. Plain old ice.
Everyone responds to dramatic effects. The news media knows that. Hollywood knows that. We are a culture bred to respond to video or photographic images. Man was first influenced by verbal story tellers, then accompanied by song, then came the written word, then the drawn or painted visual word, followed by photographs, then moving photographs, now video and everything digitized and available anywhere at the speed of light.
This is why glaciers are used so often to depict "catastrophic" global warming, because they are visual, huge, dramatic, and awe-inspiring. Imagine, people take cruises to places like Alaska, Patagonia, Argentina, and Antarctica, for what? To see big ice cubes (glaciers) melt. Then they attribute the melting to man's burning of fossil fuels and the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2). Apparently, many people are so awed by this melting ice they are willing to open their wallets and freely give money to those who promise stop the calamity of big melting ice cubes. This melting and freezing of glacial ice has always been going on. It is nothing new. Al Gore did not invent it. It is not a catastrophe because President Obama's teleprompter says so, or because John Kerry is instructed to say it is. It all sounds insane, doesn't it. Well, it is.
Why do they continue lying to us about global warming and climate change as being (or implied to be) man-caused in articles like the following? The only answer is we are being manipulated. What is the reason? If this effort is based on lies, it is wrong, and our money (taxes) are being taken unfairly and we ought to be outraged. Can it be much simpler than that? Are we so afraid to dissent and disagree that we march along like sheep to the slaughter? Have we as a people, as a nation, sunk so low, become so passive, so obedient? I hope not, even if recent election results seem to indicate otherwise.
Peter
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22229752.600-ice-sheets-may-have-already-passed-point-of-no-return.html#.U6uKCjco6eQ
Everyone responds to dramatic effects. The news media knows that. Hollywood knows that. We are a culture bred to respond to video or photographic images. Man was first influenced by verbal story tellers, then accompanied by song, then came the written word, then the drawn or painted visual word, followed by photographs, then moving photographs, now video and everything digitized and available anywhere at the speed of light.
This is why glaciers are used so often to depict "catastrophic" global warming, because they are visual, huge, dramatic, and awe-inspiring. Imagine, people take cruises to places like Alaska, Patagonia, Argentina, and Antarctica, for what? To see big ice cubes (glaciers) melt. Then they attribute the melting to man's burning of fossil fuels and the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2). Apparently, many people are so awed by this melting ice they are willing to open their wallets and freely give money to those who promise stop the calamity of big melting ice cubes. This melting and freezing of glacial ice has always been going on. It is nothing new. Al Gore did not invent it. It is not a catastrophe because President Obama's teleprompter says so, or because John Kerry is instructed to say it is. It all sounds insane, doesn't it. Well, it is.
Why do they continue lying to us about global warming and climate change as being (or implied to be) man-caused in articles like the following? The only answer is we are being manipulated. What is the reason? If this effort is based on lies, it is wrong, and our money (taxes) are being taken unfairly and we ought to be outraged. Can it be much simpler than that? Are we so afraid to dissent and disagree that we march along like sheep to the slaughter? Have we as a people, as a nation, sunk so low, become so passive, so obedient? I hope not, even if recent election results seem to indicate otherwise.
Peter
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22229752.600-ice-sheets-may-have-already-passed-point-of-no-return.html#.U6uKCjco6eQ
"THE cracks are beginning to show. Greenland's ice sheets slid into the sea 400,000 years ago, when Earth was only a little warmer than it is today. That could mean we are set for a repeat performance.
The finding, along with data from Antarctica, suggests both of Earth's big ice sheets may have already passed a crucial tipping point, condemning them to collapse – either melting, or sliding into the ocean. That will mean sea levels rising by as much as 13 metres, leading to massive coastal flooding. So how fast will the ice collapse, and can we stop it?"
(Is the above statement from the linked article complete sensationalist nonsense, or what? Of course it is, and it is typical of what our young people are being fed and considered science. Think of what a steady diet of this poison does. And we wonder why people vote the way they do? Peter)
Labels:
Al Gore,
carbon dioxide,
carbon emissions,
climate change,
CO2,
fake,
glaciers,
global warming,
hoax,
lies,
Obama,
taxes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)