Thursday, May 8, 2008

The End Of The Myth Of Man Caused Global Warming?

Read this very carefully and consider its implications. The myth of man-caused global warming is being disproved by actual observations. I wonder if someone sent a "carbon copy" of this to Al Gore? Better yet, let him spend his $300 Million on advertising trying to convince people that his myth is still true.
Peter

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri
Chairman Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
c/o World Meteorological Organization
7bis Avenue de la PaixC.P. 2300 CH- 1211 Geneva 2,Switzerland

14 April 2008

Dear Dr. Pachauri and others associated with IPCC
We are writing to you and others associated with the IPCC position – that man’s CO2 is a driver of global warming and climate change – to ask that you now in view of the evidence retract support from the current IPCC position [as in footnote 1] and admit that there is no observational evidence in measured data going back 22,000 years or even millions of years that CO2 levels (whether from man or nature) have driven or are driving world temperatures or climate change.
If you believe there is evidence of the CO2 driver theory in the available data please present a graph of it.

We draw your attention to three observational refutations of the IPCC position (and note there are more). Icecore data from the ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment) shows that temperatures have fallen since around 4,000 years ago (the Bronze Age Climate Optimum) while CO2 levels have risen, yet this graphical data was not included in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers (Fig. SPM1 Feb07) which graphed the CO2 rise.

More recent data shows that in the opposite sense to IPCC predictions world temperatures have not risen and indeed have fallen over the past 10 years while CO 2 levels have risen dramatically.

The up-dated temperature measurements have been released by the NASA’s Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU)[1] as well as by the UK’s Hadley Climate Research Unit (Temperature v. 3, variance adjusted - Hadley CRUT3v) [2]. In parallel, readings of atmospheric concentrations of CO2 have been released by the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii [3]. They have been combined in graphical form by Joe D’Aleo [4], and are shown below.
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Correlation_Last_Decade.pdf

2 These latest temperature readings represent averages of records obtained from standardized meteorological stations from around the planet, located in both urban as well as rural settings. They are augmented by satellite data, now generally accepted as ultimately authoritative, since they have a global footprint and are not easily vulnerable to manipulation nor observer error. What is also clear from the graphs is that average global temperatures have been in stasis for almost a decade and may now even be falling.

A third important observation is that contrary to the CO2 driver theory, temperatures in the upper troposphere (where most jets fly) have fallen over the past two decades. [Footnote 2]
IPCC policy is already leading to economic and unintended environmental damage. Specifically the policy of burning food – maize as biofuel – has contributed to sharp rises in food prices which are causing great hardship in many countries and is also now leading to increased deforestation in Brazil, Malaysia, Indonesia, Togo, Cambodia, Nigeria, Burundi, Sri Lanka, Benin and Uganda for cultivation of crops [5].

Given the economic devastation that is already happening and which is now widely recognised will continue to flow from this policy, what possible justification can there be for its retention?
We ask you and all those whose names are associated with IPCC policy to accept the scientific observations and renounce current IPCC policy.

Yours sincerely,
Hans Schreuder Piers Corbyn Dr Don Parkes Svend HendriksenAnalytical Chemist UK Astrophysicist UK Prof. Human Ecology (Ret) Nobel Peace Prize 1988 (shared) mMensa Dir. WeatherAction.com Australia and Japan Greenlandhans@tech-know.eu piers@weatheraction.com dnp@networksmm.com.au hendriksen@greennet.glCc: IPCC’s yu.izrael@g23.relcom.ru christy@nsstc.uah.edu spencer@nsstc.uah.eduandy.pitman@gmail.com Tim Yeo MP (Chairman Environmental Audit Committee)Lord Martin Rees (President Royal Society)Gordon Brown MPDavid Cameron MPNick Glegg MPKevin Rudd, PM of Australia

Footnote 1: Two heavily publicised quotations which emerged from your organisation, respectively in February and December last year, are:
Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations. It is likely that there has been significant anthropogenic warming over the past 50 years averaged over each continent (except Antarctica) (Figure SPM.4).{2.4} [6] and The 2007 IPCC report, compiled by several hundred climate scientists, has unequivocally concluded that our climate is warming
rapidly, and that we are now at least 90% certain that this is mostly due to human activities. The amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere now far exceeds the natural range of the past 650,000 years, and it is rising very quickly due to human activity. If this trend is not halted soon, many millions of people will be at risk from extreme events such as heat waves, drought, floods and storms, our coasts and cities will be threatened by rising sea levels, and many ecosystems, plants and animal species will be in serious danger of extinction. (Summary statement, Bali Conference.) [7].

Footnote 2: "Data over the past two decades indicates that temperatures have actually declined in the upper troposphere, even though there has been some minor upward trends in temperature at sea level and lower altitudes. This completely contradicts conventional global warming models. Before we radically rearrange the political economy of the world because some scientists claim anthropogenic CO2 is the cause of climate change, it might be worthwhile for anyone taking a position on the topic to consider whether or not this is indeed "well settled science." Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT, March 2008.
References:
1. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/msu.html 2. http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature 3. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ 4. http://icecap.us/index.php/go/experts Joseph D’Aleo, Certified Consultant Meteorologist, Fellow of the American Meteorological Society (AMS), Executive Director Icecap.us5. http://rainforests.mongabay.com/0801.htm 6. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf 7. http://www.climate.unsw.edu.au/bali/

4 comments:

USpace said...

.
Great stuff, thanks for posting this. Now, if we could only get 50% of the population to read this. We must keep spreading the word.
Gore and his Man-Bear-Pig. The politicians on board with this scam must be simply out of their minds.
For one thing, there’s plenty of oil and NG, we just need to drill for it and refine it. Also expand and improve nuclear, wind, hydro, solar and hemp fuel.

Can’t anybody talk some sense into McCain, Bush and Obama about how temperatures rise first, and THEN carbon-dioxide levels rise.
Carbon-dioxide doesn’t cause warming, sun activity does, warming causes CO2 levels to rise.
.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
humans’ breath is poison

just one child hurts the world
worse than a jet engine

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
don't research all theories

put an end to all debate
silence all your critics

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
spread hysteria

wildly exaggerate
scare little kids not ready

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
keep people all worked up

about global warming
despite inconvenient facts

.
The Great Global Warming Scam Movie
.
Philosophy of Liberty Cartoon
.
USpace

:)
.

Alishana said...

After seeing your Blog I can say that it’s very nice and its content is also very nice. WoW Gold is the topic which I like most to write about.I fact Iwas looking for information regarding Wow Gold and I reached in your blog. But very nice Blog.I liked it.

Aion kinah said...

Nice blog

wow gold kaufen said...

Very nice blog