Showing posts with label man-made global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label man-made global warming. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

The Madness Of The Crowd......And Man-Made Global Warming Mythology

One of the most common arguments in favor of the concept of man-made global warming (now "climate change" and "climate chaos"????) it that a consensus exists among scientists about global warming.  First of all, this is increasingly untrue.  Secondly, science is not conducted by consensus, or majority rule.  Science is about finding the truth, whether 1% or 99% percent of those polled believe in something matters not; all that matters is the truth, right or wrong.

The following very well written essay addresses the influence mob mentality has on politics and government policy making.  If the mob, or the simple majority rules, above and beyond reason, the end result is at best, bad laws, at worst, totalitarianism and fascism.  This has been proven time after time throughout human history.  The author and historian of the following article (Victor David Hanson) explains and illustrates this clearly.

What is of particular interest to me, and the central issue of this blog, is how mob mentality has been used and abused in creating and perpetuating the myth of man-caused global warming.  I include an excerpt from the following article, which can be found here in its entirety.
 
http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/beware-of-the-mob/?singlepage=true

Read the entire article please.  The manner in which the liberal left has harnessed mob mentality and manipulated the "masses" would make the Nazi Germans envious.  They are using this same group psychology in an effort to control every aspect of our lives.  Man-made global warming is just one symptom of the disease the liberal left is spreading throughout America and the world.
Peter

Beware of the Mob
March 25, 2012 - 11:31 am - by Victor Davis Hanson
 
Planet Warming on Hold
"One of the most venomous lines of attack against George W. Bush was his supposed failure to address climate change. These were the mob days of the anguished Al Gore, still smarting over having won the popular, but not the electoral, vote in 2000, damning Bush as a liar, as he created Gore, Inc. — a near organic-growing merchandising empire of several hundred millions of dollars.

Gorism both hyped a global carbon threat and then offered the consulting and expertise to address it. His carbon footprints and “offsets” followed the medieval model of selling exemptions. In such holy work, there were no such things as conflict of interest, influence peddling, or simple bad manners. Gore rode his Earth in the Balance / Inconvenient Truth express train to a Nobel Prize, a sizable fortune — and a general impression that he had become unhinged, whether in his incarnation as a “crazed sex poodle” or a vein-bursting screaming “he lied!” mental patient.

No matter, Barack Obama came into office on the shoulders of this screaming mob. His team lectured us on the wisdom of withholding oil leases, on the desirability of European-level gas prices, and on why we must soon pay skyrocketing energy prices. Obama-sanctioned cap-and-trade passed the Democratic-held House.
And then?

Snow fell.
Ice still formed outside the kitchen window. Chicago, as is its habit, got both really hot and really cold. Volvos still needed gas. People in Malibu still liked central heating. Philology adjusted accordingly. Global warming begat climate change and the latter begat climate chaos: if the planet were not hotter, then snow and ice were symptoms of such heating; and if even that were insufficient proof for us dunces, then tornados, earthquakes, and hurricanes would have to do.

Yet the mob mentality began to fade, as revelations about everything from doctored research, politicized grant-giving, and false conclusions about glaciers, Greenland, and polar bears began appearing in the liberal news — suggesting that if such scandal made even the mainstream media, then the phrenology-like fad was nearing an end.

Obama had done his part in postponing the Keystone pipeline, putting oil on federal lands off-limits, and talking up boondoggles like the Chevy Volt and Solyndra. But the idea of $5 a gallon gas makes even the most liberal Santa Monica Volvo driver edgy, and now the global-warming movement has collapsed. Bush is in Texas, not the White House. Obama now blames Solyndra on Republicans, brags about entrepreneurial wildcatters in the Dakotas, does photo-ops in front of derricks, and promises to allow bits and pieces of the Keystone pipeline.

And the mob? Why hurt the liberal cause by going after Obama? Suddenly, the would-be-lynchers have left the sheriff’s office porch and are in twos and threes heading back home."

read the entire article here.
'

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Copenhagen And Climate Change: A Big, Cruel Joke

And the joke is on us, every one of us. Climate change is a constant and natural process. It always has been and always will be. Carbon dioxide emissions can not possibly account for a significant, if even noticeable amount of global warming. The recent ClimateGate scandal has shown many of the most prominent climate "scientists" are liars and cheats and the entire man-caused global warming theory is based on fraud and deception.

So here we have a fraudulent concept, known as man-caused global warming, and hundreds of top government officials from countries all around the world are meeting in Copenhagen trying to decide how much more taxpayer money should be wasted on this fraud. It defies the imagination how so many people can be either ignorant or downright evil. That and witness how the mainstream media goes right along with the charade. See the following from "The New York Times."
Peter



SOURCE
The Politics of Global Warming

Representatives of 192 nations are gathering this week in Copenhagen to seek a consensus on an international strategy for fighting global warming. A new report has found that an overall warming trend is continuing. Another study suggests that the steps needed to slow that climb, or reverse it, will cost trillions of dollars.

Prior to this week's meeting, the United States announced targets to reduce industrial emissions. Just a day later, China announced its position. However, the two countries are taking different approaches.

Experts agree that a global agreement is unlikely. One major stumbling block: finding a way for richer and poorer nations to share the costs of switching to less-polluting technologies.