Peter
| 
 | ||
 
It's been a rough stretch for Colorado's "new 
energy economy." Over the last few months, the Centennial State's green energy 
industry, which the new energy economy was supposed to kick start, has been 
beset by a series of setbacks. Loveland-based Abound Solar went bankrupt; Vestas 
Wind Systems laid off almost 200 workers at its Windsor blade plant; and General 
Electric pulled the plug on a planned solar manufacturing plant in Aurora. 
The troubles of renewable energy companies 
are not unique to Colorado; they extend nationwide. U.S. taxpayers ponied up $60 
billion for green energy "investments" as part of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009, better known as the stimulus bill. The results are 
only coming in only now, and they are not good. The list of "stimulosers" — of 
which Solyndra is only the most famous example — is long and growing. It 
includes Beacon Power, Evergreen Solar, Amonix, A123 Systems, Nevada Geothermal 
Power, and many others. 
These green industries are in trouble for a 
simple reason. They are running out of subsidies. The 2009 stimulus has been 
spent and the wind production tax credit is set to expire in December. Without a 
steady influx of taxpayer help, renewable energy sources like wind and solar 
power cannot compete, due to their high capital costs and intermittent 
supply. 
How dependent on government are these 
industries? The American Wind Energy Association estimates that almost half of 
the entire wind power workforce — almost 37,000 people — would lose their jobs 
if Congress were to allow a single tax subsidy to expire. Such sudden and severe 
contractions are symptomatic of industries whose business plan is predicated on 
political favoritism. When the political winds change and the subsidies on which 
these companies depend are cut, the bottom falls out from under them. 
On the demand side, green energy entails 
higher rates for consumers. In 2011, for example, a New Energy Economy policy 
known as the Solar*Rewards program accounted for almost 4 percent of sales, 
despite generating a scant half a percent of Xcel Energy's system-wide power. 
That's a bad deal for Coloradans. Unfortunately, the burden on Xcel ratepayers 
will only increase with the expiration of federal subsidies, which have 
effectively discounted Colorado's policies. 
Somewhat paradoxically, the new energy 
economy's biggest expense likely will pertain to fossil fuels. The 2010 Clean 
Air Clean Jobs Act mandated that Xcel Energy generate from natural gas almost 
1,000 megawatts of base load supply that it now gets from coal. At current 
prices, natural gas is historically cheap, but it is still more than twice as 
expensive as coal, according to Xcel Energy's regulatory filings. 
And let's not forget that the price of 
natural gas reached historical highs only four summers ago. In fact, the high 
cost and volatility of the natural gas market relative to coal was the primary 
reason that the Colorado utilities have relied on the latter to meet the 
preponderance of the state's energy needs. 
A spike in the price of gas after the current 
supply contracts expire would cost Xcel Energy ratepayers dearly. 
The worst aspect of the new energy economy 
program is its regressive nature. Utility bills represent a larger portion of 
poor households' budgets, so the new energy economy's costs are shouldered 
disproportionately by those who can least afford them. 
Before the new energy economy program came 
along, Colorado utilities' decisions on how to provide power to consumers were 
guided by considerations on how to do so most efficiently at the least cost. 
Now, many of those decisions are based on political considerations, such as the 
need to prop up renewable energy, imposed by politicians. As a result, Colorado 
ratepayers can expect to pay for unsustainable subsidies, endure lower power 
supply reliability, and suffer unexpected consequences — all in the name of 
green ideology. 
William 
Yeatman is assistant director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the 
Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market think tank in Washington, 
D.C.  
 |