tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post3202512825013833142..comments2023-11-05T05:13:10.901-06:00Comments on Pete'sPlace On Global Warming/Climate Change: Doomsday Is Approaching For Climate Change AlarmistsPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12792460740514151650noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-57213130900156003112008-12-10T16:48:00.000-06:002008-12-10T16:48:00.000-06:00Yep - not peer reviewed, unlike the IPCC 2007 work...Yep - not peer reviewed, unlike the IPCC 2007 work which was both peer reviewed several times and reviewed in open plenary with about 140 country's scientists, lawyers and statisticians present (more that 300 generally agnostic and penetrating reviewers). Doesn't cme much more rigorous than that. Oh, you didn't realise that the IPCC process was that rigorous? Of course not, because you've been gulled by denialists. This post is evidence of looniness. Time to face facts, maties. How does a wet year disprove climate change? Pathetic really to misrepresent climate variability for a lack of climate change evidence, especially because projections of rainfall change will take decades to emerge. Anyway, that is pretty typical of the "Professor's" thinking processes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com