tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post942503522612133121..comments2023-11-05T05:13:10.901-06:00Comments on Pete'sPlace On Global Warming/Climate Change: Global Warming's Foolish SupportersPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12792460740514151650noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-19911835935584684792008-03-21T00:14:00.000-05:002008-03-21T00:14:00.000-05:00Mike,Yes, it has been a cold winter. What is it y...Mike,<BR/>Yes, it has been a cold winter. What is it you're not buying?Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12792460740514151650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-73120014893885926402008-03-20T21:50:00.000-05:002008-03-20T21:50:00.000-05:00Sorry, just not buying it. The whole debate is pol...Sorry, just not buying it. The whole debate is political, not scientific. The winter of 2007/2008 has been the coldest winter since 1997/1998. Friday 3-21-2008 is the first day of spring and were expecting 6 to 14 inches of snow.Mike Pynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02355465358704987618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-84085403243221065352008-02-10T22:43:00.000-06:002008-02-10T22:43:00.000-06:00Mike,I've never heard your idea before. I agree t...Mike,<BR/>I've never heard your idea before. I agree that the theory of man-caused global warming is wrong, but not for the reasons you suggest. Wrong is wrong....the length of time that we have "valid" data is irrelevant. We have valid measures of Earth's temperature history for millions of years, not just two hundred. Thanks for your visit.<BR/>PetePeterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12792460740514151650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-38887449779028802242008-02-10T12:52:00.000-06:002008-02-10T12:52:00.000-06:00We simply do not know or have enough data to make ...We simply do not know or have enough data to make a logical decision/opinion about global warming. <BR/>Global Warming Data Big Picture: When we theorize about the possibility of global warming we must first look at Earth age and the length of time we have been recording the Earth's cooling and warming. If the Earth is 10,000 yrs old with 200 years of data, then the validity of our data is weighted at 2%.<BR/>Earth 1,000,000 yrs, recorded data 200 yrs, then valid data = .02%. Earth 1,000,000,000 yrs, recorded data 200 yrs, then valid data = .00002%. Summary, it's statistically safe to say we do not have enough data to validate a claim. (Period) <BR/><BR/>Best regards,<BR/><BR/>Mike Pyne<BR/>Germantown, WI, 53022Mike Pynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02355465358704987618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941560477618551520.post-17858164596417786182007-03-23T14:19:00.000-05:002007-03-23T14:19:00.000-05:00One of the comments asks, what more evidence do we...One of the comments asks, what more evidence do we need of climate change? The planet has been in a constant state of change since the dawn of time. Nothing we do is going to prevent that. Plants and animals have adapted to those changes or have faced extinction.. all without human intervention. It's the cycle of life.<BR/><BR/>That doesn't mean we shouldn't address or attempt to correct any problems we may have caused. But let's address them honestly, without exaggerations or sentimentality or unwarranted fear.. because as the other comment said, our children will pay the price for our ignorance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com